User talk:Correctinfo86

May 2021

Hello, I'm DaxServer. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Devendra Fadnavis, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. -- DaxServer (talk) 08:26, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DaxServer Sir, Noted, will be more vigilant henceforth.

Devendra Fadnavis

Hello. Thanks for your contributions to Devendra Fadnavis. Most of the sections you have added under the section Flagship Projects & Initiatives is a copy paste from the news articles. It is potentially a copyright violation. Please read the related Wikipedia policy here: Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources. Please rewrite all the sub-sections you have added in your own words. Thank you! -- DaxServer (talk) 10:02, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links

Hi, it is regarding this edit. Please do not embed external links in the article body. Use them as sources instead, better yet use WP:Independent sources. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:07, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also do not mark them as WP:MINOR edit. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:09, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you changing citation style? Do not embed external links in the article, use them as source using ref tags. If you are having problem understanding it, tell me. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:18, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Correctinfo86. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 21:27, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Correctinfo86. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 09:05, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]