User talk:Corruptcongress

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Sagarika Ghose, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. ConconJondor (talk) 02:36, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Three revert rule

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sagarika Ghose. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Keith D (talk) 19:59, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for For violation of 3 revert rule on Sagarika Ghose. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Keith D (talk) 23:33, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Sagarika Ghose. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You cannot claim that Sagarika Ghose has racist and biased views without a reliable source 7 01:42, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article has references to Sagarika's tweet Racist Tweet where she has mentioned that all Indian men are Ugly. It was acknowledged by TeamCNN CNN support acknowledges Racist Tweet, which is official CNN support. I am not sure what else you are looking for.

Sagarika Ghose

Hi, just a note that I blocked both parties on this article, please discuss things on the talk page between yourselves. On the material you are adding you need to have a reliable source as to the information. Twitter is not considered a reliable source so you need to use another source such as the BBC, a newspaper or book to verify the material. Keith D (talk) 02:19, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:43, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please stop. Twitter is a quote from a person, but it is not a reliable source for the intent or outcome or response (or lack of response) for an action. By attempting to compare past and current twitter incidents and point out that one resulted in the employee getting fired, while another did not is original research by you and is campaigning for action to be taken. 7 04:13, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]