User talk:Cranedr
A tag has been placed on CriminalWatchDog.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of CriminalWatchDog.com and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 00:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- The subject of the article does not meet the notability criteria. Therefore it was deleted as non-notable. Truth to be told, I don't see a possibility for this to have an article here for the moment. Lectonar (talk) 08:48, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- I cant' explain you why the article you mentioned is on wikipedia (and anyway, your reasoning is covered inWP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, but the article deleted did not satisfy the criteria for notability. Lectonar (talk) 08:06, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Then you will have to take it to deletion review. Lectonar (talk) 08:05, 13 March 2009 (UTC)