User talk:Crazy Man127

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Crazy Man127, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Jac16888 (talk) 02:18, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comanche

Some of your edits to the Comanche article were useful, but restoring the old, problem ridden reference section was not. Equally unfunny was restoring the vandalism both (1) to the "Social order" section sentence: your version: "These included the "funny looking chief," the members of the council, and the "other funny looking chief.", unvandalized version "These included the "peace chief," the members of the council, and the "war chief."" and (2) to the Childbirth section heading. You cannot assume that all edits after point A are not in the best interests of the article, you have to evaluate each one. Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoset. ( "Kill them all. God will know His own.") is usually not a useful editing approach. --Bejnar (talk) 19:49, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of Style

If you haven't done so already you might want to take a look at Wikipedia:How to edit a page and Wikipedia:Manual of Style and its many sub-pages. --Bejnar (talk) 20:12, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]