Jump to content

User talk:Crazynas/October2011

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please comment on Talk:Coat of arms of Spain

[edit]
Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Coat of arms of Spain. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 20:06, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 3 October 2011

[edit]

Be more careful

[edit]

My edit was not vandalism. My edit did re-format someone else's vandalism on a talk page, but that was to distinguish it from my own heading on a talk page. This opinion is shared by the owner of the talk page, as he left my edits in-tact (save for giving the other user his own heading). Please be more careful when issuing warnings. Also, please consider reverting my warning level, as an increase was not justified. 76.119.75.131 (talk) 09:55, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, what's up with whenever someone with admin-powers seeing an edit made by an IP user, they assume it must be vandalism? I thought Wiki admins were supposed to be welcoming? 76.119.75.131 (talk) 09:58, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I'm not an admin, I just don't like people that think it's funny or fun or good to add dis(mis)information to one of the top websites on the planet, get away with it. Now I'm not saying you did that, but lots of people do, and it happens. Now sometimes those of us that try to help out with this make a mistake or the software bugs out or something that really really looks like vandalism isn't. So, sorry if you're offended I know I wasn't when I got reverted by the same person... Crazynas t 10:25, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Not offended at all, just with the bump in warning level, it kind of makes things tough for me around here now. 76.119.75.131 (talk) 10:32, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As the only reasonable mod I've run into around here today - Why are mods here so eager to increase people's warning level without due diligence into the situation? 76.119.75.131 (talk) 10:46, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It has to do with huggle I think, and the fact that it's considered impolite to revert someone without letting them know. Think of it this way, would you rather I didn't tell you that I reverted something you did, 20 seconds after you did it. Warnings are also it is true a way to gauge weather and editor has been a useful contributor to the project, but it's really about the edits you make to project space. Follow the five pillars and you'll be fine. But why not register? It's simple free and anonymous and I wouldn't know what US state you're in right now. Also I'm not a mod, or anything like that, just another editor that's been around for a bit. Crazynas t

The Signpost: 10 October 2011

[edit]

Please comment on Talk:Ejaculation

[edit]
Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ejaculation. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 07:48, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To answer your question...

[edit]

Hi there. I watchlist Template:Vandalism information, so I just happened to see this edit summary. To answer your question, it's because it's based off the DEFCON levels. The system was originally known as "WikiDefcon", actually. Anyway...there you have it. :p Regards, Swarm 12:15, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, I remember the def-con system. My question was more in relation to the template design. I just went back and looked, must have been more tired then I thought when I changed it last night... for some reason I had it in my head that you put in a '2' to make it 'defcon 4'(although I changed the template appropriately). Crazynas t 16:37, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Dana Tyler

[edit]
Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Dana Tyler. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 October 2011

[edit]

Please comment on Talk:Men's rights

[edit]
Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Men's rights. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 20:19, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Ralph Nader presidential campaign, 2000

[edit]
Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ralph Nader presidential campaign, 2000. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

[edit]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Crazynas/October2011! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Please comment on Category talk:Lists of people by nationality

[edit]
Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Category talk:Lists of people by nationality. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 10:15, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 October 2011

[edit]

Please comment on Talk:Christiane Pflug

[edit]
Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Christiane Pflug. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Crazynas/October2011&oldid=1139763740"