User talk:Ctracy1

Welcome!

Hello, Ctracy1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Ian.thomson (talk) 19:07, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A summary of site policies and guidelines you may find useful

"Truth" is not the criteria for inclusion, verifiability is.
Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use <ref>reference tags like this</ref>, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for. In the case of science, this evidence must ultimately start with physical evidence. In the case of religion, this means only reporting what has been written and not taking any stance on doctrine.
We do not give equal validity to topics which reject and are rejected by mainstream academia. For example, our article on Earth does not pretend it is flat, hollow, and/or the center of the universe.
Wikipedia is not censored. If material is reliably sourced, it is given due weight.
Minor edits are those that add or remove little content, and mainly consists of undoing undeniable vandalism or fixing grammar, spelling, or formatting errors. Ian.thomson (talk) 19:07, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teilhard

I saw and have reverted your edit on this article, and have explained why on the article's talk page. That you may disagree with an attributed author is your right, but cutting articles about for that reason absolutely is not. The article quietly and objectively discusses Teilhard's views, and quotes the views of a range of other people on him, which is exactly what it should be doing. I do hope this is clear, as it is fundamental to the working of the encyclopedia. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:50, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]