User talk:Cv05648

A tag has been placed on Vassilis Papadopoulos, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bonadea 14:16, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Anastasios Manettas, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to add more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Fan-1967 14:17, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Baklava

Your comments can take place in the article, bur firstly you should supply your sources supporting your view. And secondly the history section is not the place for this text to take place. Thanks --Chapultepec 01:57, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will relocate it below preparation section for the time being. But one problem, your source seems not so explanatory, would you please name your source in more details? It doesn't have to be an internet source, but it should at least be a book, a report or a documentary that can be reached with the given details. This way is not so acceptable. But I'll be waiting for you to detail your official sources for awhile. Thanks. --Chapultepec 02:17, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok, I got it. But noone can check a past news programme. There has to be some official documentation in the EU legislation regarding this. Would you please check the internet in official EU sites and find the related report or legislation regarding this, or at least a title or a text mentioning about this? I hope you will be able to find some official documentary on it. --Chapultepec 02:34, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you find any official documentation on it? --Chapultepec 03:05, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:3RR

Please beware of the three-revert rule. If you revert again on Baklava, you will be breaking this rule. And please avoid adding inivisible comments into the article as if threatening other editors [1], such acts can be considered disruption of Wikipedia. Thank you and happy new year. Baristarim 12:38, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

what's up vas

Image copyright problem with Image:PC082458.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:PC082458.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:18, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:PC082450.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:PC082450.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:23, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]