User talk:Cydrell
April 2014[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kent Hovind has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kent Hovind was changed by Cydrell (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.876335 on 2014-04-04T05:02:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:02, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 05:30, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Answers in Genesis, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Answers in Genesis was changed by Cydrell (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959823 on 2014-04-04T05:34:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:34, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
For Your Information[edit]
Hi. This is mophedd. I noticed that your edits on Kent Hovind got reverted. I would personally recommend discussing changes on the talk page before making major edits to the article. It is labeled controversial for a reason. Hopefully we can all reach a consensus. Cheers, Mophedd (talk) 07:21, 4 April 2014 (UTC)