User talk:DG Bizel

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mitch Gaylord, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 00:04, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Sally Struthers. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 00:16, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the advice. I was not aware of that.DG Bizel (talk) 00:24, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Delaware pound. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:17, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

~~Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Delaware pound. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:18, 15 November 2009 (UTC)~~[reply]

Please disregard the above. Thanks, FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:20, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Talk:Sally Struthers. FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:27, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am so, so sorry. I was merely following the advice of User:Hairhorn above, where he encouraged me to discuss potential changes on the discussion page of the article.DG Bizel (talk) 00:31, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't drag me into this. Libel on a talk page is just as bad as libel in an article. And sourcing a news story to a "sneezing panda" video makes it pretty clear that the only aim is vandalism. Hairhorn (talk) 00:47, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]