User talk:DHT863

Creating my talk page. DHT863 (talk) 01:20, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bookbinding

I did just a minor edit to this page, but I appreciate the 'thank you' note. I usually write material, but sometimes I find and add sources to articles to keep them from being nominated for deletion. I also get involved some in 'articles for deletion' discussions and work to be fair, as anyone creating anything deserves a chance to improve it. Bill Pollard (talk) 20:58, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Republic

I suggest that for the bigger changes you want to make on Republic that you post them first as drafts on the talk page.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 11:08, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"I have posted three sections on the talk page of "Republic": Recommendations, First Paragraph, and Fifth paragraph. ---DHT863 (talk) 16:53, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Omnipaedista: Hello, I thanked you for edits on "List of Republics". I want to make an edits on "Republic (disamb) and have run into very stubborn "owners" of the site - they continue to revert everything I do. Can you take a look see and tell me what you think? --- DHT863 (talk) 20:37, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The content of each article reflects the consensus among the editors who regularly edit it. I have never edited "Republic", nor I intend to do so in the near future. --Omnipaedista (talk) 14:50, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Republic

Your recent editing history at Republic shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Francis Schonken (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

They are minor edits. Do you recognize that they are only minor? I am not the bad guy here. Tell me who is the person that keeps reverting my work? What intellectual authority does he hold to revert without suggestions, without improvements, without corrections? How can I trust you if no one responds to my comments on talk page? Have you read anything of my recommendations? Have you tried evaluating the quality of suggestions? Please can I get a human response rather than dictatorial orders? Please, I am begging for mercy. -- DHT863 (talk) 19:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:58, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to leave despite all the advice that's been given you, then leave. The community doesn't have to sit back and take your abuse. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:03, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]