User talk:DK2828

October 2024

Hello, I'm Gaismagorm. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Remigration seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gaismagorm (talk) 17:02, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Gaismagorm. I think there is an error in the page. remigration defintion: The meaning of REMIGRATION is the act of migrating again; especially : the act of returning to one's original or previous home after a migration.

To conclude that this concept is in all aspects "far-right" is the same as saying that globalism or multiculturalism is "far-left". Neither of these are correct or helpful, or factual.

Thank you a lot, I will proceed further with this matter in case it is not revised or seriously looked at. If this is not removed, then it seems only natural that globalism and multiculturalism be revised as far-left, which I will also follow up on.

Best regards,

DK2828 DK2828 (talk) 17:13, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I highly reccomend reading Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. This article is about the concept itself, and how it is used by members of far right groups. Gaismagorm (talk) 17:16, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No the page is remigration. You then choose that you want to focus on it in "far-right" associations. Christianity is also used in a lot of "far-right groups", is this then also "far-right"? DK2828 (talk) 17:25, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

we focus on far right associations when it is what is most notable Gaismagorm (talk) 17:27, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

if you wish to make such a change to the articles, make a post on the article's talk page. Gaismagorm (talk) 17:27, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright thank you DK2828 (talk) 17:28, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no problem Gaismagorm (talk) 17:28, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ah I can also see other people in the talk page saying the same thing. No regard for their comments either. Guess wikipedia is just like the rest, leftist censorship. Too bad, just made a profile hoping for actual neutrality. DK2828 (talk) 17:34, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you just want to read what you want to hear, this isn't the place for you. Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources say about a topic. Any bias in sources will be reflected in Wikipedia. Sources are presented to readers so they can evaluate and judge them for themselves- as you did- when determining what they think or believe. If you disagree with what sources say, you need to take that up with them first, not us.

If you're here to push right wing talking points, you'll have a very difficult time here; this place is a forum to collaborate with other human beings of all races, religions, genders, political views, you name it, to write an encyclopedia. If you're unable to do that without making unfounded claims of "leftist censorship", this isn't the place for you. Conservapedia is thataway. 331dot (talk) 17:40, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it seems only natural that globalism and multiculturalism be revised as far-left The Mongol Empire at its height was incredibly multicultural but I wouldn't call it far-left. Polygnotus (talk) 18:48, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]