User talk:DKFANFOREVER

June 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Surya Sen have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Surya Sen was changed by DKFANFOREVER (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953069 on 2022-06-16T17:47:43+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:47, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did with this edit to Benoy Basu. Thank you. Le Marteau (talk) 05:58, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Benoy Basu, you may be blocked from editing. Le Marteau (talk) 06:00, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not vandalising, the information I'm adding is true. (User:DKFANFOREVER) 06:02, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, User:DKFANFOREVER, Wikipedia works on ”verifiability, not truth” as a guiding principle. This policy states that “Wikipedia's content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. That we have rules for the inclusion of material does not mean Wikipedians have no respect for truth and accuracy, just as a court's reliance on rules of evidence does not mean the court does not respect truth. Wikipedia values accuracy, but it requires verifiability.”, Wikipedia works on ”verifiability, not truth” as a guiding principle. This policy states that “Wikipedia's content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. That we have rules for the inclusion of material does not mean Wikipedians have no respect for truth and accuracy, just as a court's reliance on rules of evidence does not mean the court does not respect truth. Wikipedia values accuracy, but it requires verifiability.” Please comply! George Custer's Sabre (talk) 07:17, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Benoy Basu

Hello. You do not appear familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. In particular, Wikipedia requires citations to reliable and authoritative third-party sources. Two good sets of Wikipedia guidelines that I have found really useful can be found HERE, regarding verifiability and HERE, regarding the need to maintain a neutral point of view. According to WP:VERIFY, "Any material that needs a source but does not have one June be removed." It also says: "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." Best regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 07:15, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]