User talk:DaltonSchultz

Welcome!

Hello, DaltonSchultz, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:35, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have an overdue training assignment.

Please complete the assigned training modules. --TrudiJ (talk) 10:32, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

Hey man, I'm done with the peer review of your article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DaltonSchultz/Strategic_Choice_Theory/CJMcKenna98_Peer_Review CJMcKenna98 (talk) 04:15, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I ended up using the criticism of the language to make the addition to the article more readable. However, since it is an addition to an existing article then there are things i did not change, for example making a lead to the article. I also do not think that I can find a picture that goes along with the page since it is a theory, so I chose to not include that in the reviewing of my article.

DaltonSchultz (talk) 00:45, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Strategic Choice theory review response

Review https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DaltonSchultz/Strategic_Choice_Theory/CJMcKenna98_Peer_Review I ended up using the criticism of the language to make the addition to the article more readable. However, since it is an addition to an existing article then there are things i did not change, for example making a lead to the article. I also do not think that I can find a picture that goes along with the page since it is a theory, so I chose to not include that in the reviewing of my article. DaltonSchultz (talk) 00:45, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]