User talk:Damian gogo

November 2020[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Zhao Lijian. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 00:21, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your accusation is groundless, please elaborate your accusation in detail, that could make the talk more constructive. Thanks a lot! Damian gogo (talk) 01:02, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If I may chime in here, I'd just like to point out that the image shared by Zhao Lijian is not satirical, objectively speaking. Satire typically has a humorous element to it... what aspect of Zhao's image is humorous? It's clearly a shock-piece. Something meant to provoke, enflame and offend. There's nothing funny about it. It's horrific. Jargo Nautilus (talk) 03:09, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, we have to admit that's a realistic artwork. Secondly, to understand the artwork, we have to look into the details of the artwork which draw a hug flag of Australia covered up some body-like substances and a Afghanistan Flag puzzle, especially with a english subtitle "bring peace". I understand a funny style is more easy to be accepted but it's only one of expressions of satire, irony is also satire. looking into the subtitle, peace? what peace? be silent? Damian gogo (talk) 03:30, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 15:18, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 15:50, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To the next admin: please see this here, my notes on a 3R report that also contain a few comments about this editor. In short, this is POV editing, BLP violating edit warring, persistent misquoting/misrepresenting of sources, all wrapped into a series of highly combative and poorly explained edits in a BLP. Drmies (talk) 15:51, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]