User talk:DanOWL678
| This user is a student editor in Rice_University/Gender_and_Politics_(Fall_2021) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, DanOWL678, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:32, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Peer Review: The article currently possesses a C rating, but it is on its way to a definite improvement in status. I think “Muslim women political leaders” efficiently encompasses various relevant subtopics, such as religious background, history of the Muslim woman role, political history of Muslim women, and movements working towards Muslim female inclusion in the public sphere. The article does a fantastic job covering the complexity of how religion and societal ideals play a role in Muslim women political representation. The writing is straight-forward and well developed, making the article’s complex topic easier to follow. Additionally, the section including the historical experiences of Muslim women politicans in different countries proves informative and essential in understanding the complexities within the political life of a Muslim woman. I think the article could benefit from a change in structure. I would instead end with examples of Muslim female political leaders, so the article transitions from the mechanisms behind Muslim women in office to examples of women achieving political power. Further, some sections describing the contributions of certain Muslim women could benefit from more information. Certain images could use more developed captions, as some only include the female politician’s name. Overall, I believe the article is well-developed, but it could benefit from some structural changes and more information in the female politicians’ section.Sarabprice (talk) 22:15, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]The articles overall status is currently at a Class C with a completeness score of 61. I believe the article includes all of the major key important topics in relevance to Muslim women as political leaders. The article’s strengths is certainly the breadth of knowledge included within it, and the detail that goes into each Muslim country’s women leaders is very impressive. Another strength is certainly the easy-to-navigate layout of the article, with many sections and subsections that are set up in a very logical manner. The article can be improved mainly through completing more countries in the political history section. Where the leaders are named from sixteen different countries, only seven countries have a subsection for political history, which leaves a large gap of information. Similarly, there are many factual statements that do not have a citation, or that are linked to citations that do not work or are not complete. Overall, I would assess the article’s completeness as closer to complete than not, but still with some work to go. The areas of information that are covered in the article are very well-developed, however there seems to be some areas that are missing, could be further developed, or simply require correct citations in order to be complete.
Good job! Madisonaph (talk) 04:15, 18 December 2021 (UTC)