User talk:Dana smk

Hello, thanks, and Welcome !

I noticed your section Slavonic calligraphy, and I would like to talk with you about what to do next. You provided a lot of text, and it will likely need to :

1. move this to a new specific article Slavonic calligraphy

2. make a shorter summary in article Calligraphy, such as : Section Salvonic Calligraphy ; sub-section 'Evolution' ; and sub-section 'features'.

Yug (talk) 13:19, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Visual art

What exactly does this have to do with visual art? A different editor has reverted your edit and I concur with him that it is not helpful. If you feel this is somehow appropriate for this article, take your suggestion to the article talk page. Thanks. freshacconci talktalk 12:56, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sirs,

This is strictly prohibited to be deleted! In the case you violate our rights as sole possessors of the Works by deleting the materials from the page, we will seize the court. This art work is a work of the visual art. This is stated by the professors of arts and calligraphy - participants of the International exhibition of calligrapjers organized by us. We are the Contemporary museum of calligraphy and the National Union of Calligraphers. We reserve all the rights to publish these works. Visual art is not only drawing and painting, you know.

This is also prohibited to be deleted! See above.

What on earth are you talking about? How is this "prohibited" from being deleted? At this point you are being disruptive and if you continue you will be blocked. Wikipedia is a collaborative effort. Please work with other editors. Use the article talk pages if you would like to make suggestions. freshacconci talktalk 10:27, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Calligraphy

This is a collaborative effort. Please make such suggestions as you feel others should adopt on the article's Talk page. It seems visually marring to the article to place those three visual entities near the top of the article, and horizontally arrayed. That is my opinion. But while it is only my opinion, I feel that your opinion is just that too. Therefore I feel that the article's Talk page is the right place for trying to reach a resolution so that the article itself comes out in optimal condition. Bus stop (talk) 08:20, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Visual arts, you will be blocked from editing. freshacconci talktalk 10:23, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The section moved to its own article: Slavonic lettering

If you are the author of this, you can help us in several ways.

First: add your sources to the article. You can make it such as :

blabla blabla (Johnshon, 1980). Blabla Blabla (Milic, 1993)
References
Johnshon, Slavonic lettering in the Middle Ages, 1980, Cambridge press.
Milic, Slavonic lettering: An Introduction, 1993, Harvard university press.

You can also help us to write a suitable 20 lines section about Slavonic lettering in Calligraphy's article. Such as :

10 lines for historical evolution : major styles/masters/dates.
10 lines for specific tools/feartures/concepts.

If you are the former author (which I suspect), then you can find your former data in Slavonic lettering. Thanks for your help ! Yug (talk) 09:10, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]