User talk:Danecheatsawholelot

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Satori Son 19:03, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Danecheatsawholelot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

did not vandalize just added link to a different opinion Danecheatsawholelot (talk) 19:16, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Besides your edit, which was contentious and not reliably sourced, your username violates policy and seems to indicate that you aren't here to improve the encyclopedia. —DoRD (talk) 19:41, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

--

TO ADMINS - I would add a sockpuppet report, but the previous username has been removed, and I can't see it. See history of Dane Rauschenberg [1] --CutOffTies (talk) 19:19, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The deletions were done by an oversighter, so most admins can't see the username or edits, either. —DoRD (talk) 19:38, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you. It seems that a sockpuppet report should be done but I guess it's not a big deal --CutOffTies (talk) 19:47, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]