User talk:Dapengzhang0

Welcome!

Hello, Dapengzhang0, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Quick introduction to Wikipedia
How to write a great article
Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia, an essay from PLoS
Identifying reliable sources (general advice)
Wikipedia's Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page.

Square root of x formula. Symbol of mathematics.

If you are interested in mathematics-related themes, you may want to check out the Mathematics Portal.
If you are interested in improving mathematics-related articles, you may want to join WikiProject Mathematics (sign up here or say hello here).

Again, welcome! Deltahedron (talk) 09:29, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Theta representation

Please comment at the article talk page -- references would be particularly helpful. Deltahedron (talk) 10:34, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replied. Dapengzhang0 (talk) 19:36, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of unsolved problems in mathematics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hamiltonian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Weil-Brezin Map (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheCatalyst31 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Zak transform instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Weil-Brezin Map and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 02:42, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Weil-Brezin Map has been accepted

Weil-Brezin Map, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 05:42, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To elaborate, I still feel like the articles are on the same essential topic based on my reading of the sources, and they probably could be covered in the same article. That said, you also make a good case for why they should be separate topics, and I don't believe in keeping articles out of mainspace over what's essentially a content disagreement, especially since you're more familiar with the topic than I am. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 05:47, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dapengzhang0. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]