User talk:Davidalanmiller

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Lee Bannon (June 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Lee Bannon.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zach Vega (talk to me) 23:05, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. I saw your comment at Zach Vega's talk page. I would like to say that since he reviewed the page concerns have been raised about his reviews. Now, I'm not judging whether this should have been called differently, but I wanted to say a few things.

Interviews are not always acceptable to establish notability, since they often consist only of the person talking about themselves. Also, the references to Joey Bada$$ only mention Bannon trivially and therefore are not so good to show notability (though they can support facts). However, you have also included the signing announcement, as well as an in-depth review which is not an interview. These are good sources - they are the sort of thing we are looking for.

In my opinion (though I can make no guarantees), if you add a couple more sources like that, and resubmit, it is quite likely the draft will be agreed to be notable. (I've added a reference to a Guardian article already.) Good luck and thank you for your contributions! BethNaught (talk) 20:18, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I also saw your comment on Zach's page. I've added some references and approved the page. (I thought it was an unusual decline, given that he's well-known, but, as BethNaught pointed out, the initial references weren't as strong as they could be.) Thanks for writing the article. Julie JSFarman (talk) 14:54, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]