User talk:Dawlatzai

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dawlatzai (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not Beh-nam. No checkuser has proven this.

Decline reason:

I blocked you. I'm a checkuser. Happy? — Alison ^❤ 06:23, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dawlatzai (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No, I'm still very upset at being blocked in the first place. Please tell me why Thatcher31 banned? I just want to make sure that know why, because it is ridiculous. Dawlatzai (talk) 06:27, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Abusing multiple accounts is a violation of Wikipedia's policies, therefore you have been blocked to prohibit you from continuing to violate policy. — MBisanz ^talk 06:35, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

... and we're all utterly tired of you guys filing checkuser requests against each other. It's ridiculous and it's wasting everyone's time - Alison ^❤ 06:41, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dawlatzai (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

MBisanz, before I was unjustly blocked, I never even once used a sockpuppet. Please look at why I was blocked and you'll realize I shouldn't even be banned in the first place. Dawlatzai (talk) 21:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were originally blocked for abusing sockpuppets, and proxying for a banned editor, hence I feel that the block was just. — Stwalkerster [ talk ] 21:55, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dawlatzai (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was never banned for using sockpuppets. Look at my case more carefully. I did not proxy for anyone, I was accused of it by an admin after I reported his friend for sockpuppetery, he banned me to get rid of me. Dawlatzai (talk) 23:27, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is an incredible waste of time... -- lucasbfr ^talk 23:30, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.