User talk:Dcosman

Welcome!

Hello, Dcosman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- JamesTeterenko 02:58, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Berlin Wall, you will be blocked from editing. Gwernol 21:18, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Struck, see below. Gwernol 14:44, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Berlin Wall[edit]

Hi. I picked up your post to User talk:Gwernol regarding the above. To name it specifically from the perspective of any "side" involved in its construction, maintenance and political significance is to overstep WP:NPOV. The article as titled now is the colloquial term which all races and countries will understand. A political slant is immediately introduced when any article purports an opinion in its title such as anti-fascist. Remember that, to West German folk, it was an anti-communist barricade. For neutrality's sake, it must remain Berlin Wall.

And I have no particular interest in the whole political issue being discussed, nor any politics of note at all really (I don't use my vote, for instance). I speak purely as one who can see what stance a Wikipedia article must take - that of neutrality and no particular propaganda, meant or otherwise.

I hope you can see my point. I actually believe that your edits are good faith, but misguided. I wish you good future editing. Best wishes. Ref ^(chew)(do) 22:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dcosman, thank you for leaving a message on my talk page - which you did correctly. I'm sorry if the warning came across as harsh, but your edits looked a great deal like vandalism, even if they were well intentioned. Articles are generally named for the common English term for the subject. If you are going to make a significant change to an article like this, its a very good idea to propose it first on the article's talk page and make sure that you have consensus for your change before making it. Finally, you would need a proper independent, published source to justify the proposed change. I have struck out the vandalism wanring above, since your edit was made in good faith. Best, Gwernol 14:44, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]