User talk:Deanywong

Welcome!

Hello, Deanywong, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Red Pocket Mobile, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 23:26, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Red Pocket Mobile[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Red Pocket Mobile requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 23:26, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

re:Red Pocket Mobile page deleted[edit]

Thanks for your message regarding the deletion of the Red Pocket Mobile article. It was deleted under the Speedy Deletion policy, specifically CSDA7 because, as written, the article does does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. I would agree with the assessment of the deleting administrator that this is the case.

You are free, of course, to challenge the validity of this deletion at Wikipedia:Deletion review, but my advice to you is that would be a fruitless exercise and a waste of your own time and that of the many other volunteers who take time to comment on these reviews.

If you can find further information that does assert the importance or significance of this company, supported by reliable sources, then this can be added to the article. Should you wish to work on the article to bring it up to standard for inclusion in Wikipedia, I would be happy to recreate it in your user space or email a copy to you for you to work on as required. Please let me know if you want me to do either of these for you.

To avoid the risk of deletion of further articles you may create in the future, please read the Wikipedia policies relevant to article creation, including:
Wikipedia:Notability
Wikipedia:Verifiability
Wikipedia:Reliable sources

I hope this helps you better understand our policies regarding suitability of articles. Let me know if you need any further information. --Cactus.man ✍ 18:41, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]