User talk:Decboy
Re: Your edit to User:Warlio
[edit]I've deleted the message you left in this edit. Messages to other user's should go on their User talk page, not their user page. Thanks. --Casper2k3 21:39, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
List of Characters From The Saga Of Darren Shan
[edit]Okay, three things:
- Wikipedia is the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit. Just because you started an article does not mean that it is "your article". You cannot make changes just because you want to.
- I used to be head of Wikipedia:WikiProject Darren Shan. Then I stopped. Wanna know why? I recieved an e-mail from Darren Shan himself after posting about the Wikiproject on the messageboards asking that I stop the project because he doesn't want the spoilers from his books to be on Wikipedia. After this, to respect his wishes, I tried to take down a lot of the spoilers on the Darren Shan pages.
- Being a jerk and posting angry messages with three exclamation points will get you nowhere in Wikipedia.
The spoilers add nothing to the article. All they do is disrespect the wishes of the author of the series. Also, the articles you linked to are not really necessary. For more information, look at Wikipedia:Notability (fiction). It basically says that you only should make pages for characters with large amounts of information known about them. Alas, Harkat does not qualify. I hope you understand now why I took off the spoilers. Because really, "Former hippie protester whose arms were bitten off." gives no less important information than "Former hippie protester whose arms were bitten off. Killled in the final book." The latter just contains an unnecessary spoiler.
All the best,
-AtionSong 18:35, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
Re: Did Darren Say That?
[edit]Although yes, Harkat and Kurda were main characters in the series, there is probably not enough information about them to fill up an entire article. For Harkat, it would just be about his night terrors and who he used to be while Kurda's would just talk about his plan to bring the vampaneze into vampire mountain. That really isn't enough to merit a full article. -AtionSong 21:18, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Bec MacConn
[edit]I have nominated Bec MacConn, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bec MacConn. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Neelix (talk) 15:31, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
The article Futurama/Simpsons Infinitely Secret Crossover Crisis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage. This article fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for books.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 18:33, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Futurama/Simpsons Infinitely Secret Crossover Crisis for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Futurama/Simpsons Infinitely Secret Crossover Crisis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Futurama/Simpsons Infinitely Secret Crossover Crisis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Neelix (talk) 20:21, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of List of The Demonata characters for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of The Demonata characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Demonata characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 93 (talk) 23:01, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
The article List of The Saga of Darren Shan characters has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Article has no citations, and a list of characters from The Saga of Darren Shan is non-notable.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)