User talk:DetmanUSA

Information was posted for informational purposes only, including government sites, and they were relevant; an administrator decided otherwise.

Accounts

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent insertion of spam, commercial content, and/or links is prohibited under policy. Any further spamming may result in your account and/or your IP address being blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you.--Hu12 (talk) 19:49, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DetmanUSA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

HU12 & To Whom It May Concern: Actually, my concern is not to be unblocked, even though I won't repeat what is considered to be in violation and I would not mind being unblocked and that of my friends; we do not intend to contribute anymore after this was considered a "violation." The citation of the site was merely added, along with a government site, because it was thought to be relevant; your administrator thought otherwise. However, having to warn only once and at the same time block (without any second warning), and to go so far as to publish a Pub ID by virtue of reverse-engingeering/hacking of a site to have it published by HU12 on here is wrong, retaliatory, and potentially exposes Wikipedia and said user to liability for making information readily available for identity theft; we meant no harm, but having to go to the extent of manipulating a site to get such information is extreme and dangerous, and it is respectfully asked to be removed. It is understood the citations we thought were relevant are not accepted by some, so let's leave it at that and not involve malice by mining a site for such information--it is respectfully requested that it be removed. Your cooperation is appreciated.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline (do not use the template unless you're seeking an unblock). Also, printing the Adsense ID#'s for spammed sites is SOP when dealing with persistent spamming of a domain; I heavily doubt it is "reverse-engineering" or anything of the sort any more than us blocking an IP because we find it's being used by an anonymizer. -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!!)} 06:57, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've revoked the talkpage privileges for the remaining socks because all your unblock requests are (α) not used to request unblock specifically, (β) veiled legal threats, (c) completely disconnected from logic (An adsense ID number will not lead to ID theft; it's not a SSN), and (δ) essentially the same unblock request over and over. -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!!)} 11:46, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]