User talk:DiamonDie

Welcome!

Hello, DiamonDie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! RJFJR 15:57, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Demoscener Wikipedians

I thought that this might be of interest for you Wikipedia:User_categories_for_discussion#Category:Demoscener_Wikipedians --roy<sac> ^Talk! .oOo. 15:43, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

dextropropoxyphene cleanup

Hello, thanks for adding the clean up tag to dextropropoxyphene. When you have a few minutes please could you add something to the article's talk page saying what you think needs to be changed? Dan Beale-Cocks 17:52, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NOV-205

Could you please provide more information on why you tagged this article with {{Article issues}}? Simply slapping a couple tags around on articles with an edit summary of "(tagged with multiple issues)" without explaining your issues on the talk page is extremely unhelpful and not productive. Since this article appears to be relatively new, instead of posting on the talk page of the article, it might help to post over on the discussion page for WikiProject Pharmacology instead.

If you do not provide further information or rationale for this action in about 3-5 days, I will remove the tag and dismiss this as a drive-by tagging. Dr. Cash (talk) 16:01, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jay Goldstein for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jay Goldstein is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Goldstein until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FuriouslySerene (talk) 18:30, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Finn Lectura

The article Finn Lectura has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, google news returned zero hits.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jerod Lycett (talk) 04:53, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]