User talk:Dieyu2012

Just in case I break any rule at Wikipedia, please leave a message ... I respect Wikipedia and intend to follow rules here. Thanks.

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Dieyu2012! Thank you for your contributions. I am Dougweller and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Dougweller (talk) 12:11, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

Take a look at WP:NOR. If you want to make an edit in Number of the Beast about 666 and the human body, you will need a source that discusses both the Number of the Beast and the human body, not just a source that discusses the body. The source needs to meet our criteria at WP:RS. Thanks for your past cooperation on this. Dougweller (talk) 12:12, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

REPLY: Got your message! It's not original research as information of my edit is included in the book - I just read it at a local library(the fifth edition, 1989). You said "I still have a mouth when I close it" - Sorry, my wording was not precise ... it should be "there are only 6 open".

Does your book mention the Number of the Beast? If it doesn't, you can't use it. Dougweller (talk) 13:33, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

REPLY: No, it doesn't. It's a medical book about human body. I thought it's enough ... I won't edit "Number of the Beast" until I have "a source that discusses both the Number of the Beast and the human body". Thanks.

Thanks for understanding. I was told the same thing when I was a new editor. Dougweller (talk) 04:58, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

REPLY: You are welcome!

REPLY: I'm going to make an edit titled "Three Sixes on Head and Hand", and all information is included in the source. "Number of the Beast" is a really important topic, as the Beast is enemy of Son of God. I read Bible a lot and know it's VERY serious. What I'm trying to contribute, is critical information about Number of the Beast - the location of six. While the source doesn't discuss about Number of the Beast, it's sufficient, as I said, all information of this edit is included in the source. Please, understand that the location of six is critical for knowing the Beast. Regards.

REPLY: I want to emphasize these two points: all information of this edit is included in the source; it's very serious and important. Thanks.

Edit warring

You really are going to have to stop adding that to the article. You can try to convince editors on the article's discussion page, but you don't have WP:Consensus for it and you seem to be trying to WP:Edit war it in. In addition, you are just barely outside of WP:3RR and even if your next edit is technically not within the 24 hours, 3RR isn't just applied literally so take this as a formal warning about 3RR. Dougweller (talk) 06:19, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

REPLY: Thanks for the warning! Got it. Yes, I make similar edits, but no more than two edits per day. I thought this is not "edit war" ... I'll "try to convince editors on the article's discussion page". Thank you!