Jump to content

User talk:Dinospartan117

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The article Seapunk has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sparthorse (talk) 04:55, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Seapunk for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Seapunk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seapunk until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sparthorse (talk) 06:01, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Sparthorse. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sparthorse (talk) 22:05, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]