Jump to content

User talk:Diplomacy rule

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hi Diplomacy rule, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Roleplayer Good luck, and have fun. --Roleplayer (talk) 17:34, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Son of God, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. DJ Clayworth (talk) 18:18, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please have a look at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view for how we write articles on subject that people disagree about. DJ Clayworth (talk) 18:20, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Son of God. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. --Blanchardb-MeMyEarsMyMouth-timed 15:45, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Son of God - Three revert rule[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Fireproeng (talk) 17:38, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for 24 hours due to your repeated edit warring. If you wish to contest this block, you may add {{unblock|your reason here}} to your talk page. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 18:15, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The 3RR report on your edits on which this block seems to be based is at WP:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR#User:Diplomacy rule reported by User:Fireproeng (Result:24 hours). --Coppertwig (talk) 18:54, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Stop adding unsourced, unencyclopedic POV. Majoreditor (talk) 01:38, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Bible, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Blanchardb-MeMyEarsMyMouth-timed 01:35, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POV[edit]

Please stop adding your own personal point of view to articles on religion; it's not appropriate. Tb (talk) 02:57, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Trinity, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Blanchardb-MeMyEarsMyMouth-timed 12:01, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]