User talk:Discodonutdave

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User talk:Ctjf83‎, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Yves (talk) 21:54, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:56, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

?ok, thanks. I will create a new account :)

This is NOT a personal attack . . .

But in case you didn't know, you are truly a fucking ignoramus. No, I'm not saying that because you're prejudiced against homosexuals. While it may be true that acceptance of homosexuals is greater amongst those with higher levels of education, it is nonetheless true that there are still some highly educated people who share your bigotry.

No, I'm not referring to your personal opinion--you're entitled to it, just as others are entitled to loathe you because of it. What I'm referring to is how truly uneducated you show yourself to be. All three of your posts call into question whether or not you've even obtained a third-grade level of eduction.

1. In this post, even if we assume that you intentionally shortened "better" to "bet", and ignore your failure to place a space between "a" and "platform", we still cannot get past your fundamental lack of understanding of 1st and 2nd grade level phonics. Your made up word "phaget" (no doubt designed to avoid bot reversion) would never be pronounced the same as your intended word, "faggot". Indeed, it took me a second to even recognize that that was what you were trying to do. You see, an educated person will look at that word and, yes, recognize the "f" sound at the beginning, but a "g" that is followed by an "e" is NOT pronounced the same as the "g" in "goat", but rather, is pronounced like the "g" in "giraffe", that is, like a "j". But that's not the only phonetic error in your infantile neologism. You see, without doubling the "g", you've made it hopelessly unclear that you intend for the "a" to have a short "a" sound (that is, the sound in the words "bat" and "fag"). Indeed, most educated readers would be inclined toward one of two choices with the "a", to either pronounce is with a long "a" (the sound in "bake") or perhaps (assuming the word to be of foreign--perhaps French--origin) like an "ah" sound). So, instead of your desired effect of getting us to read "FAG ət", we are more likely to read this as "FAY jit" or even "fah ZHAY". Really, I have to wonder if you can even read.
2. Secondly, this edit could be written off as just a typo, but I must say, when your edit consists of a single word and you make two errors (a "d" instead of an "s", and leaving out a space), that's a pretty huge error, proportionately speaking.
3. And finally, while you've been on Wikipedia long enough to know how to create an account, follow discussions, and vandalize, you're still ignorant enough of procedures here to not realize that, despite your claim in this edit, you can't create another account while this one is blocked. But then again, now you know that, don't you?

I don't hate you for your hatred and bigotry. I pity you for what a pathetic existence must come with an educational level as low as yours. HuskyHuskie (talk) 04:33, 22 January 2011 (UTC)