User talk:Djayjp

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Djayjp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Slashme 12:38, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary[edit]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Ginkgo. Thank you. --Slashme 12:37, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Schizophrenia, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Prashanthns (talk) 22:38, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Thanks for understanding!Prashanthns (talk) 06:43, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Long-term effects of alcohol[edit]

I have replied to your comment on that page. Spiro Keats (talk) 08:13, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Protein Digestibility Corrected Amino Acid Score, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wheat gluten. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi: Your edits to Language[edit]

The version you are trying to change has been the result of a long standing consensus of editors on the page. We have discussed several times whether the definition should state that it is a specifically human capacity and each time consensus has been that yes, it should. Consensus may change so what you need to do is participate in a new discussion at the talkpage, which I have started for you here, where you can argue for why the word should be removed. You cannot simply remove a word when a majority of other editors have decided it should be there. If you try to do that through simple editwarring you are likely to be blocked. Instead go to the discussion page and make an argument. Perhaps other editors will agree with you and a consensus will form for removing the word. That is the process to follow. All the best.User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 00:31, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Djayjp. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Djayjp. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fusion energy gain[edit]

You made a minor edit to the breakeven article, but what caught my attention was the checkin note:

added 'significantly' to the 'larger than 1' first image caption, as net energy gains of 1% have been observed form fusion reactors

Can you name this example? I am unaware of any net energy gain from a controlled fusion reactor. Maury Markowitz (talk) 13:45, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]