User talk:Dkadbar85

Speedy deletion nomination of Bagg Street

Hello Dkadbar85,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bagg Street for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. H.dryad (talk) 14:46, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bagg Street

The article Bagg Street has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I see nothing that would indicate that this is a notable street.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- GB fan 15:09, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]