User talk:Vanished renamed user 201908242122221/2008-april-may

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive Dec 2005 - Jan. 5, 2008

RE: criteria[edit]

Hey there Dlohcierekim, I replied to your message on my talk page. Cheers. Wisdom89 (T / C) 05:09, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dlohcierekim, thanks for the encouragement. This is my first post. I am doing it for a graduate school class. Let me know if there are any improvements I can make.  :) User:Cwhanna

Thanks for the message, Mr. Sock. I'll aim to be great wikipedian! TylerTrum (talk) 02:00, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hi[edit]

thanks for the welcom. your nice--Bananasinpajamasfanboy8 (talk) 00:29, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello![edit]

Hello, I wanted to thank-you for the helpful pages. I needed them alot. Your doing a great job. ;) Keep up the excellent work! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Royboy999 (talkcontribs) 00:34, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Just in case you hadn't noticed, another user tagged Allen Morris (historian) as being of questionable notability. You might want to return to the article and see if you can improve it. Good luck! Karanacs (talk) 20:13, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting case. Its possible it really is Nik Antropov, in which case WP:COI would be relevant. I think its more likely just a fan who is adding info. None of the additions are sourced whoever it is, and the username is inappropriate unless it really is Mr. Antropov. I reverted his changes to the Nik Antropov article and left a warning about unsourced additions. Best, Gwernol

Socks are not welcome[edit]

Welcoming new users is nice, but welcoming the xxth sock of a banned user is not a good idea. See User talk:Adadasu. Accounts that use edit summaries like "Undo NAZI servant" should be treated with some caution. -- Matthead  Discuß   01:25, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thank-spam[edit]

Vanished renamed user 201908242122221/2008-april-may, just a note of appreciation for your recent support of my request for adminship, which ended successfully with 112 supports, 2 opposes, and 1 neutral. If there's something I've realized during my RFA process this last week, it's that adminship is primarily about trust. I will strive to honour that trust in my future interactions with the community. Many thanks! Gatoclass (talk) 06:26, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]