User talk:Dmezei

Welcome!

Hello, Dmezei, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 17:38, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knowledge management and Knowledge management

Once you have contributed content to Wikipedia, you do not have copyright or any other rights over it. Under the GFDL, the license to whihc you assent when you make your edits, you no longer own the text. If you don't like that, I'm afraid you have come to the wrong project. Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 17:38, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Once you click save, you agree to our GFDL license. It's impossible to rescind that permission. Sorry. · Katefan0^(scribble)/poll 18:32, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever

you keep my work up there but take down my references? Sorry, I'm reporting you.

To whom? I am an admin. I am also warning you that what you are doing is considered vandalism, and if you do it once more you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C]

17:53, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're an ADMIN??? STOP TAKING DOWN MY REFERENCES. DMEZEI

s/REFERENCES/namechecks/ Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C]

22:41, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

References?

I am curious what references are you refering to? Mike _{(T C)} 18:03, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

KM article

Please calm down a bit. As a matter of policy, nobody owns an article... anyone can contribute or edit. It's community property. And all contributions are licensed under the GFDL; there's the text explaining so at the bottom of the edit box. Clicking "save page" accepts that license. You can't revoke community rights to use the text you contributed, unless you want to challenge the legality of the GFDL or the shrinkwrap license on the clickbox.

I am uninvolved in the dispute over the KM article contents and slightly familiar with KM tools and techniques. I will review edits made by other editors and see if they were improving the article or not, and if they were NPOV or not. This will probably take a few hours. Please calm down and don't aggrivate the situation in the meantime. If I agree with you that the references were a good idea I'll assist in arguing for / editing for their return. If not, I'll explain why I think they weren't good and then back out of further discussions if you want. Georgewilliamherbert 23:57, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I came to some preliminary conclusions and posted them to Talk:Knowledge management. Short summary: I think your original references to your own work were not Neutral enough from real NPOV, but the longer references set you included near the beginning of the edit conflict proper was good and should have been left, in my opinion. Georgewilliamherbert 10:27, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

interesting: reply

The problem with removing Einstein, Galileo and Newton is they published their work, their work has been peer reviewed, and accepted. Thereofre NOT original work. Its not original ideas, rather unpublished original work!. Mike _{(T C)} 20:55, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]