User talk:Dometicgroup

Welcome!

Hello, Dometicgroup, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Condaria, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WWGB (talk) 12:58, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Condaria

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Condaria requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WWGB (talk) 12:58, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended or used for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, celebrity or other well-known individual, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, or organization. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

What can I do now?

You are still welcome to write about something other than your company or organization. If you do intend to make useful contributions on some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, please see how to appeal a block. Alexf^(talk) 13:00, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dometicgroup (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Tina_N (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I still do not understand why I got blocked? I have tried to add generall information about the company that isn't selling. Since we are an old company and customers expect us to be on Wikipedia I did try to make it as generall as I could. Could you pls help me to understand what content that wasn't accepted. My goal is to inform the history about the company and also who we are. Is there any way that I can get an answer? I have tried to comment the adminitrators, but since I'm blocked I cannot write anything.

Decline reason:

If you can write two whole articles full of such prose as "Striving for the best reputation and flawless production, Condaria conducts tough product tests and closely monitors production, installation and operation", "state-of-the-art in performance and quality", "with a solid market position based on its strong tradition of competitive drive", and so on and so on, and sincerely not think you are writing to promote your business, then you are clearly not able to stand back far enough from your subject matter to see it from the detached and objective point of view that is needed. An excellent example of one of the main reasons why the conflict of interest guideline discourages editing on a subject to which you have a close connection. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:34, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK. You were blocked because your username was against our policy, by seeming to represent a company or organisation. Accounts here are for individuals only, and must only be used by the persons themselves. As to your edits so far, I've looked at your two deleted articles - and they failed WP:NPOV rather badly. That's Neutral Point of View. Not easy, when you work for them. We do not encourage people to write about closely associated subjects, but it is allowed so long as that policy is adhered to. 'Focussed' and 'Striving for the best reputation and flawless production' are promotional terms. They appear to come straight from a directory entry or business profile. Please remember that this is an encyclopaedia. You also did not provide any independent sources - see WP:RS. Your own sites cannot establish notability - bringing me to WP:CORP. Even long established companies may not have enough independent coverage to be notable. Peridon (talk) 14:11, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BTW Posts on talk pages should be at the bottom of the page, unless part of an existing thread. Thanks. Peridon (talk) 14:12, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dometicgroup (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Tina_N (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Ok. I've rewritten the content and all I have now is basic fact like the year the company was founded + what the company is doing (ex. focuses on building chilled water air-conditioning systems for very large yachts, navy vessels, workboats, and patrol boats). I have written an email to the administrator about it and am waiting for a respond. Is there anything else I need to do to get un-blocked?

Decline reason:

You have a clear conflict of interest. Please read, understand, and comprehend Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. In cases where you have a conflict of interest, you should not be writing articles about the subject. At most, you may try instead to propose a new article on Wikipedia:Articles for creation or create the article as a sub-page from your user page and ask someone to move it to main space. It is clear from your initial attempt, as well as your attempt to be unblocked, that your purpose here isn't to contribute to an encyclopedia in accordance with our policies and guidelines, but to get your company exposure on Wikipedia. It doesn't matter if "your customers expect you to be on Wikipedia". That isn't a valid reason for having an article here. Your customers can easily find information about your company on your company web site. Because you don't seem willing or able to refrain from editing with a conflict of interest, I am declining this unblock request. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:44, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]