Jump to content

User talk:Domniqencore

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello D, I have said what need to be said, and will do so again in the future. But my time is valuable, and I have no intention of squandering it on sterile "debates." Let the kids play. There is a lot of other good work to be done. I have been having an interesting time of it at the Jules Verne article. No thuggery there, just the usual culture wars. Cheers, Haiduc (talk) 10:27, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

refs?

[edit]

Hello, and thanks for your useful suggestions. One more thing, it would be helpful if you could provide some references to the material you contributed a while ago. In particular I would appreciate a hand with that line about Greek love being practiced in secret. I know it is in the literature because I have come across it myself, I just cannot remember where. Can you? Thanks, Haiduc (talk) 02:39, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I was not familiar with the material. The Encyclopedia entry I have read, it is quite to the point, but not the Percy piece. I'll look for it on the web. Haiduc (talk) 00:10, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The scarlet letter of "block evasion"

[edit]
12:25, 4 December 2007 Dmcdevit (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "Dominique Blanc (Talk | contribs)" (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite ‎ (pedophilia editor on an open proxy, likely reincarnation) (Unblock)
Hello.
Please don't use this account further until you've arranged for the main account to be unblocked. You're clearly not atempting to hide anything, and thus any suggestions you're using alternate accounts to avoid a block would be well wide of the mark, but it's still not allowed. I'll neither make the block myself nor put a notice up anywhere, since I'm making lots of effort to be "even handed."
brenneman 00:25, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: your message

[edit]

Domniqencore, User:Dmcdevit is still an active administrator, so please contract him regarding your old account. And by the way, thanks for stating the matter openly, but as Brenneman notes above, you're technically violating the terms of a ban, so please don't make any substantive edits until this is sorted out. Cheers. --Akhilleus (talk) 13:47, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Statement

[edit]

The account ‘Dominique Blanc’ has now been cleared by Dcmdevit. The block was made in error, and this has been acknowledged by the administrator concerned, and entered in the log. I am satisfied that the matter was handled properly and with due regard to the sensitivities of the situation. Correspondence was conducted by email, and I have commended the administrator for his professionalism and his respect for privacy in this matter. The account of ‘Domniqencore’ will be retained pro tem while current discussions on the article, ‘Pederasty’, are in progress. Domniqencore (talk) 19:03, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for sorting that out. - brenneman 00:04, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]