User talk:Download/Archives/2012/July
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
AutoWikiBroswer
Just a notice: Today we uploaded a new AutoWikiBroswer version which corrects a lot of exceptions and other annoying stuff. I suggest you download it from: http://toolserver.org/~awb/snapshots/ -- Magioladitis (talk) 05:02, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- Ah, perfect. In fact I'm using an older version right now! Thanks for the notice. -download ׀ talk 05:04, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Dear Author/Download
My name is Nuša Farič and I am a Health Psychology MSc student at the University College London (UCL). I am currently running a quantitative study entitled Who edits health-related Wikipedia pages and why? I am interested in the editorial experience of people who edit health-related Wikipedia pages. I am interested to learn more about the authors of health-related pages on Wikipedia and what motivations they have for doing so. I am currently contacting the authors of randomly selected articles and I noticed that someone at this address recently edited an article on Rectal Examination. I would like to ask you a few questions about you and your experience of editing the above mentioned article and or other health-related articles. If you would like more information about the project, please visit my user page (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Hydra_Rain) and if interested, please reply via my talk page or e-mail me on nusa.faric.11@ucl.ac.uk. Also, others interested in the study may contact me! If I do not hear back from you I will not contact this account again. Thank you very much in advance. Hydra Rain (talk) 19:07, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
Corrections to links in your userspace
Hello. I have made some corrections here and here to some links in your userspace. I hope you don't object. Thanks. 69.155.143.96 (talk) 00:56, 19 July 2012 (UTC), last modified 00:56, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot! :) -download ׀ talk 01:40, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
- You're welcome! 69.155.143.96 (talk) 19:42, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Romanesque architecture
The "NOTE" in "small" was in small, because it was totally irrelevant to the topic of the article. It referred to the single non-Romanesque feature of the building and reassured those editors who might find it confusing (I was told by an anxious editor that they might) that the traceried Gothic window was, in fact, both traceried and Gothic, and therefore out of the scope of the article, i.e. one of the countless thousand additions to the thousand-year-old buildings that are the subject of the article. If this sounds convoluted and ridiculous to you, it is because it is. But there you are! One cannot presume that a person reading the article could look at it and say, "Oh, that window must have been inserted later", so I tell them so. But I put it in small type, because it is irrelevant. to the subject......
The message is: Here and there through the articles on historical architectural styles, you will find little messages such as "The spires are Baroque". Please leave them as they are. It means that they are not pertinent to the subject of the article, but are strictly an informative aside.