User talk:DrHerbertSewell

December 2008[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DrHerbertSewell (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

blocked because of unbelievable bias against any criticism, political bias

Decline reason:

You have been blocked for edit warring. It is no insult, the policy applies to all editors. The comment below can be taken to mean that you are posing a threat to continue. I would advise you to retract it because it could mean an extension to the block for making threats which are not tolerated. — Sandahl 22:06, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So, it is your intention to insult me, and then cut off my ability to respond. This has just begun. You are wrong.--DrHerbertSewell (talk) 21:08, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your block has been extended to one week for block evasion, and the edits you made while blocked have been reverted. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 23:22, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]