User talk:Drharishc

Welcome!

Hello, Drharishc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Epic (web browser), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Miami33139 (talk) 01:26, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Epic (web browser)[edit]

I have nominated Epic (web browser), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epic (web browser). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Miami33139 (talk) 01:26, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Civility to other editors[edit]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. In this edit, where you addressed another editor as a "a retarded hooligan", you were not being constructive. Over the course of the years in which I have worked on Wikipedia I have found that users who are civil are, on the whole, much more likely to get support for their views than those who are not, quite apart from being civil in order to be more pleasant to other editors. Another point concerning that edit is that it is not at all wrong to nominate an article for a deletion discussion which turns out to have sufficient notability to be kept. If one is in doubt then the very fact of starting a discussion enables other editors to find evidence of notability and clear up such doubt. JamesBWatson (talk) 07:29, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No regrets...as you sow, so you reap...that's all...i believe that his arguments about article's notability were biased. I honor WP:OTHERSTUFF, but can't keep noticing the bias. The article Epic (web browser) will not be created again, as I have no good faith for those who marked this article for deletion. Let the editor prove his credibility by reviewing other articles like Maxthon, Sleipnir etc. etc.

I will no longer be a contributor to Wikipedia. Thanks for all those who supported contributed to this article.