User talk:Dtneilson

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Srleffler 06:21, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wavelength-division multiplexing, British English + welcome

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia. We can always use additional fibre-savvy (fiber-savvy?) technical people.

I appreciate your additions to the WDM article. I did make some minor changes, however. To head off petty little wars over which version of English to use, Wikipedia came up with a guideline that says that if an article is started in American English, it stays in American English (and likewise for articles started in British English). There are some obvious exceptions; articles on uniquely American subjects such as United States Navy will always be in American English while the Royal Navy article will always stay British. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style#National varieties of English for the details.

Anyway, welcome again to Wikipedia.--A. B. 06:28, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In my defense there were both spellings of fiber/fibre on the page when I started to edit it. As the guidelines point out an article is supposed to be in a single version of English. Since pretty much all of Wikipedia's fiber optics pages actually use fiber in the page title I presumed that was the original language. Although if you are interested the optical amplifier page is a mess of fiber and fibre. Even though my native language is British English I have never liked the use of fibre for optics : fibre is something one needs more of in ones diet or character --Dtneilson 07:11, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not to worry and you certainly don't have to defend yourself -- I was just letting you know. You'd be amazed at the petty little wars that have broken out over this. See (or skim) Talk:Under the Umbrella Tree#Canadian vs. American spelling and Talk:Under the Umbrella Tree#RfC for an example; as for my own philosophy, you can read my own comments at the end of the RfC section. (You might also enjoy some of the uniquely Canadian/American links I posted).

As for the other articles, feel free to fix things as you see them. --A. B. 07:39, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link to Talk:Under the Umbrella Tree#Canadian vs. American spelling. It made my laugh and reminded me of the South Park Movie. I think we should be content when articles are written in English and the spellings of the words match at least one accepted version. Dtneilson 00:58, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Optical DPSK demodulator

Your recent edit to Optical DPSK demodulator (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 04:17, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You got it, redirects don't work too well w/o the [[braces]] :) -- 64.180.84.87 09:40, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Clos moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Charles Clos. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 20:20, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Charles Clos

Hello, Dtneilson. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Charles Clos, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Charles Clos

Hello, Dtneilson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Charles Clos".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:14, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]