User talk:DuffieldDan

July 2013[edit]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Woodstock, Oxfordshire. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Please stop adding the same URL to all these sites read WP:PROMO WP:SPAM Tmol42 (talk) 11:10, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Cookham. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. As per previous warning I am not sure if your intention is innocent or is to promote a commercial URL site but either way adding such links on a mass basis is not appropriate on WP. I suggest you revert your other edits perhaps after reading the links to the WP policy guidance articles I have provided. Thanks Tmol42 (talk) 11:15, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Dave.Dunford (talk) 11:21, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Henley-on-Thames. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. - After many years of being warned you are still spamming Wikipedia. Please stop now. --David Biddulph (talk) 20:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We are not spamming. Our website offers free, relevant and informative content which we believe to be of interest to others. So why should we not add a link?--DuffieldDan (talk) 08:57, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]