To answer your question, the current sources are simply too trivial and although the company may not be instantly new as it once was, what is currently available is simply no different in better significant coverage. Weighing this, it would have better chances if we waited later and reconsider when there's the best amount of that needed coverage as even one or two different articles may still show the result of not enough. We're highly selective here, yes, but it's only because we fully consider the available sourcing. SwisterTwistertalk 07:42, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
