Jump to content

User talk:Earslaner2001

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Sultanate of Rum, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:02, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So why is it not accepted even though it is written in the sources I have written below that the Seljuks were from Oghuz Turks?
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Sultanate-of-Rum https://worldhistorycommons.org/sites/default/files/2022-09/MarcoPolo.jpg Earslaner2001 (talk) 23:10, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No is denying that they were Turks, the article even says that... However you are removing sourced info, which is disruptive. You also do realize you're not allowed to evade your block? (WP:BLOCKEVASION) Pinging @Pickersgill-Cunliffe: The two links that this user mentions were also mentioned by User:Altugedt [1] whom you blocked a few hours ago. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:13, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is no source in this article shows us Sultanate of Rum is Turco-Persian or culturally Turco-Persian. Also I don't expect you should act neutral in this article because your username is History of Iran. Earslaner2001 (talk) 23:20, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Its sourced down below, read the article. I don't care about the opinion of a blocked user. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:24, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Although "The Seljuks originated from the Kinik branch of the Oghuz Turks" is mentioned in the Oghuz Khagan article and "Concise Britannica Online Seljuq Dynasty" is included in the sources, why is it not mentioned in the main article "Sultanate of Rum"?
Source:
Concise Britannica Online Seljuq Dynasty Archived 2007-01-14 at the Wayback Machine article
Merriam-Webster Online – Definition of Seljuk Archived 15 October 2007 at the Wayback Machine
The History of the Seljuq Turks: From the Jami Al-Tawarikh (LINK)
Shaw, Stanford. History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey (LINK)
Golden, Peter B. (1992). An Introduction to the History of the Turkic People. Otto Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden. p. 209 Earslaner2001 (talk) 23:54, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-attributed translations

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from tr:Yüksek_İmtiyaz_Nişanı to Order of the Highest Privilege (Ottoman Empire). While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 00:08, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]