User talk:Earthyperson
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 03:03, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 03:37, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Materialscientist (talk) 04:38, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Earthyperson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Laura Albert created a literary fraud, not a literary persona. She obviously is controlling and spinning the public perception just as she always did with her lies.Wikipedia should not be a platform for her lies.Earthyperson (talk) 05:15, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This is not a reason to unblock you. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Optimist on the run (talk) 06:40, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.