User talk:Editor8778

This page has been blanked as a courtesy.

Proposed deletion of Fleur Geffrier

Hello, Editor8778

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Chaotic Enby, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Fleur Geffrier, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Chaotic Enby}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:02, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alternative title (publishing)

The article Alternative title (publishing) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Duplicate topic of Subtitle (titling).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Moriwen (talk) 17:49, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alternative title (publishing) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alternative title (publishing) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternative title (publishing) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— Moriwen (talk) 17:55, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Largest and heaviest animals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Extant.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:43, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Crocker Galleria moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Crocker Galleria. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Broc (talk) 14:19, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crocker Galleria has been accepted

Crocker Galleria, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:33, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Editor8778. Thank you for your work on Synergetic linguistics. Another editor, Botterweg14, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this article! I've marked it as reviewed, but I would strongly suggest upgrading the sourcing. Right now there are number of claims that should be referenced and the sources that are used aren't quite the Wikipedia gold standard. As someone who has written these kinds of articles, I often find it useful to check for sources in The Oxford Handbook of X or The Cambridge Companion to X-type volumes, for various values of X. Just as a curious reader, I would suggest adding more information about how this field is different from other branches of quantitative linguistics. And it can also be useful in these sorts of articles to provide a worked-through concrete example, though of course this can be hard depending on the subject matter and the availability of reliable sources.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Botterweg14}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Botterweg14 (talk) 00:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]