User talk:Editthewoke
August 2024
[edit]
Hello, I'm Jonathan Deamer. I noticed that you recently removed content from Lionel (radio personality) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. WaPo is a reliable source and is appropriate as a citation for this fact. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 16:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Lionel,has nothing to do with Qanon, this is a made up lie, this is called besmirchment desgined to hurt one's careeer because of his views, it is a lie, one entertaining some "conspoiracy theories" does not mean he is part of Qanon. This is left wing bias, left wing besmirchment and intelectual dishonesty at the highest level. I know you think you can besmirch and slander anyone who is not a devout Democrat or leftist, however it is a crime Editthewoke (talk) 16:28, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- The Wikipedia article is merely repeating something reported by The Washington Post and The Hill. AntiDionysius (talk) 16:30, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Both of those articles refrenced are biased, left wing besmirchment, Lionel has entertained certain "conspracy theories" which does not mean he supports "Qanon", it is not professional to refrence articles written with a pure bias, Lionel has mocked QNON . You can say Lionel has entertained and discussed conspracy theories on his shows, but to call him " known as a leading promoter of the far-right QAnon conspiracy theory" is in itself extreme left wing bias. Both the Hill and WaPost are biased, far left, Democrat party friendly outlets. You and your left wing extremists, want to besmirch and destroy anyone who questuons any left wing orthodoxy with the word "Qanon", I work in media, I was not born yesterday Editthewoke (talk) 16:39, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Well, Wikipedia doesn't consider them "biased, far left, Democrat party friendly outlets"* (because they aren't). So here we are.
- *Also "far left, Democrat [sic] party" - which is it? Is it far left or is it pro-Democratic party? It can't be both. AntiDionysius (talk) 16:41, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- This is like saying Infowars is not right wing or Breitbart is not conservative. How ignorant do you think we are? Thus is besmirchment , Lionel has nothing to do with Qanon. Editthewoke (talk) 16:46, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- As an actual member of the far-left I resent being told the Democratic Party represents anything I stand for. AntiDionysius (talk) 16:47, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- This is like saying Infowars is not right wing or Breitbart is not conservative. How ignorant do you think we are? Thus is besmirchment , Lionel has nothing to do with Qanon. Editthewoke (talk) 16:46, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- *Also "far left, Democrat [sic] party" - which is it? Is it far left or is it pro-Democratic party? It can't be both. AntiDionysius (talk) 16:41, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lionel (radio personality). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 16:25, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- This is not anything other than correctting, intelectually dishonest besmirchment Editthewoke (talk) 16:30, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- You are removing something that is attributed to reliable sources, with no basis other than your own insistence that it is a "lie". That is unconstructive. If you would like to start a discussion over at Talk:Lionel (radio personality) to try to get consensus for your proposed deletion, please do so, however other editors will expect you to bring evidence (i.e. reliable sources) to back up your claims. Do not continue removing the passage from the article unilaterally. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 16:33, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- I will do it repeatedly, I do not care if you suspend my account, I will switch my IP. this is besmirchment it has to stop Editthewoke (talk) 16:45, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Every IP you use will get blocked. If you do it enough times, the article will be protected so IP users cannot edit it. You will lose this fight. I would advise not wasting your time. AntiDionysius (talk) 16:46, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- I will do it repeatedly, I do not care if you suspend my account, I will switch my IP. this is besmirchment it has to stop Editthewoke (talk) 16:45, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- You are removing something that is attributed to reliable sources, with no basis other than your own insistence that it is a "lie". That is unconstructive. If you would like to start a discussion over at Talk:Lionel (radio personality) to try to get consensus for your proposed deletion, please do so, however other editors will expect you to bring evidence (i.e. reliable sources) to back up your claims. Do not continue removing the passage from the article unilaterally. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 16:33, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lionel (radio personality), you may be blocked from editing. AntiDionysius (talk) 16:44, 26 August 2024 (UTC)