User talk:Edumacater

Conspiracy theory material[edit]

Please stop adding unreferenced and out-of-context conspiracy theory stuff to various Wikipedia articles. Binksternet (talk) 17:56, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is not unreferenced. On my original article editing the History of Frankfurt, I have referenced a book by John Reeves from which I took the information. There is a difference between a conspiracy theory and conspiracy facts.

August 2014[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to History of the United States. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Binksternet (talk) 18:50, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kissinger[edit]

Please do not add unsourced content like "A possible advocate of a future one-world government" to articles. [1] WE base content on published sources, not vague insinuations from contributors. AndyTheGrump (talk) 10:06, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I shall remove it. But the remainder is correct.

Since you have continued to spam multiple articles with the same conspiracy-theory bollocks [2] I shall be reporting your behaviour, and asking that you be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a tinfiol-hat-wearers convention. AndyTheGrump (talk) 10:31, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have only reported facts, from verifiable sources. I have not violated any rights of anyone or any guidelines of wikipedia. Just because you want the world to be indoctrinated with your mainstream lies, doesn't mean everyone has to fear you.

You're also infringing upon my freedom of speech, in that case.

Re: your apparent misconception, please read Wikipedia:Free speech. HandsomeFella (talk) 12:22, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You must be a disinformation agent yourself to dispute solid evidence. Sir Walter Scott's book said exactly what I said it had said.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.AndyTheGrump (talk) 10:42, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing and not being here to help build the encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 05:32, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]