User talk:Eggishorn/Archive/2007

Archives

2007

2008

2013

Welcome

:)

Hello, Eggishorn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. I see you haven't received a welcome yet, so here you are. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement:

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or feel free to ask me on my talk page.
Again, welcome! —MrSomeone ^{( tlk • cntrb )} 20:56, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

Thanks for watching over Fudge. it tends to get a lot of vanadlaism. i tried to get the page semi-protected but was denied. Any help you can give in the furture is greatly appreciated. I watch over articles that tend to get a lot of homophobic vandalism and it takes a lot of effort so your help is very welcome. thanks again.LiPollis 16:56, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. Got your note. I didn't realize it was such a problem on new pages. I'll try and keep an eye out there as well. I appreciate the head's up. it's a shame that so many people want to treat wikipedia like a grade school playground - oh wait.. lots of these vandals are in Grade school aren't they? hehe. ;-) Thanks LiPollis 08:06, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Whineskin

I just put a hangon for the Whineskin page. You deemed it an advertisement, but its not advertising anything. The link to the blog can be removed. Its a little underground paper that has been in circulation for about five years on one of the most widely know and endowed theological seminaries in the world. Its not subversive. The dean of academics loves it. The professors look forward to it coming out and the students are constantly asking when new ones are coming out. It reflects a flavor of the seminary that everyone loves. The Whineskin doesn't make any profit. Even the clothing that's on cafepress has no mark up (and no one buys it anyways!). I just felt like its place in our institution is worth of having it be on wikipedia. If you want the blog links and the cafepress links off that's totally fine. But please leave the short history of the newsletter up. Thanks. judahpedia ;)

Nah, s'allright.

I just have really quick reflexes. I have stuff to do anyway, so I'll leave it to you. You were there first anyway. HalfShadow 17:32, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's the featured article anyway; there are probably 20 people watching it regardless. HalfShadow 17:59, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editorial assistance

I apologize for not recognizing you earlier. I am just getting familiar with this type of userbox. You may want to place the following on your user page:

This user helped promote Campbell's Soup Cans assessed as one of Wikipedia's featured articles on Wikipedia.

TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 20:49, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pissed Jeans

If I show you a few reasons why the band is notable, is it possible for you to bring my article back? Or is it lost forever? I mean, they've been reviewed by some pretty major publications, their new album just came out, they've been together for a few years...what more do you want? NIRVANA2764 20:12, 8 June 2007 (UTC)Cite error: The opening <ref> tag is malformed or has a bad name (see the help page).[reply]