User talk:Eguinho

Downtown Church

Slant downgraded her rating! What's up with them? Hekerui (talk) 13:16, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have all her stuff. And I enjoyed the NPR streaming of her album, despite the genre. If you want to talk about music feel free to send me an email as this goes beyond the Wiki scope. And please remember to post talk page messages at the bottom of a page. Best Hekerui (talk) 16:44, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, no problem! :) Hekerui (talk) 16:52, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Have One On Me

Concerning your comment regarding the album cover for Have One On Me, I have added a question asking if you have a reference to support your assertion that the cover is the official one - I think some evidence that it's the official cover is as important as evidence to support the claimed track listing, and that both should be removed if no evidence can be provided. Boing! said Zebedee 16:44, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know it looks very fan made, then i posted a few references. I posted on the discussion page! =] Eguinho (talk) 22:21, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I've replied back on the Talk page. Boing! said Zebedee 05:21, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

okay, i think the time to accumulate references is done. everyone pretty much thinks this album is awesome (because it is!). i think we should now concentrate on describing what it sounds like (a difficult task!), and why it isn't ys or the milk eyed mender. we have like a million refs :P --Kaini (talk) 23:40, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk Page

Please use the talk page on the Congratulations album to further discuss our review replacement. Thank You.--F-22 Raptör^{Aces High♠} 22:19, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Crazy for You (album)

The article Crazy for You (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:NSONG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jimmy Pitt talk 13:40, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

Hi. When you recently edited Middle Cyclone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Phoenix (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]