User talk:Egyptian pharaoh take

April 2022

Hello, I'm Tbhotch. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Salvador Cabañas have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 03:50, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Throast. An edit that you recently made to Sateri seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Throast (talk | contribs) 17:31, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The content on the page is promotional. Thanks. Egyptian pharaoh take (talk) 04:11, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Egyptian pharaoh take. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Ryan Kavanaugh, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Pabsoluterince (talk) 07:36, 5 April 2022 (UTC) § Hi thank you for your contribution. In line with my edit, while conducting my research on the dynamic changes to the film industry, i have come across conflicted information on this page, so i thought i should correct for future reference. Egyptian pharaoh take (talk) 07:45, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Let me know if any guidelines or reference should be adjusted. Thank you. Egyptian pharaoh take (talk) 07:46, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When you attempt to boldly update a page, it is important to provide reliable sources. The WP:LEDE is meant to summarise imformation in the body of the article. Take a look at the talk page, there is a discussion surrounding the use of co-founder or founder that you can participate in. Pabsoluterince (talk) 07:51, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks,Here is a source in reference to additional content.

https://www.reuters.com/markets/deals/triller-go-public-via-5-bln-merger-with-seachange-international-2021-12-22/ I suppose this resource qualifies as a reliable source. Egyptian pharaoh take (talk) 08:05, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable source

. Supports the inclusion

. The source doesn't mention Kavanaugh, Proxima media, IEG sports or Critical content. As of that report, TrillerVerz Corp doesn't exist yet. Additionally, a reliable source that supports an inclusion does not mean that the exclusion of content is justified. Please take any further discussions about the addition to the talk page. Pabsoluterince (talk) 08:14, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

GeneralNotability (talk) 20:23, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]