Jump to content

User talk:Elchasai

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

hi xy i welcome your input i am in the middle of making this entry more informative, this is my first time contributing to wikipedia. Please give me pointers on all of the points where i am lacking. I am goingo to add alot more content, just getting the hang of all the aspects. I am a little tired today because i worked 12 hours today but the entry should be spruced up even more, one of the references listed, the sites one will be used even more then the one reference to zarqawi already. leadership, the use of murasel in such movements, and the al-fajr media center, and its place within the theological framewrok established through the naming of things will be examined, as well as the actual behavior of "murasel" who I am currently examing in detail in an anthroplogical manner right now.

What Next?[edit]

Is there anyway, either alkivar, HighinBC or Yamla that we can work toward a timed ban rather than an indefinite ban. I accept your reasonings for denying my request for unblock. And looking again over my contrib history I would agree yamla about the Osama Bin Laden addition for instance as an example of vandalism--I think being new to wikipedia I was just getting use to the structure, the ways of typing and deleting in that instance, and it was only a couple minutes or less that that was up there. But BC I agree with you that my latest conduct was indeed uncivil. So I fully accept the majoritarian opinion of you who have taken it upon yourselves to review my unblock request. But if it were possible to move to a ban of a month or some weeks or longer or shorter I would be able to fruitfully prepare some of the reasearch I've been gathering on little-publicised, but sufficiently sourcable terrorist groups/criminal gangs and syndicates in Iraq, such as the Mujahideen of Jerusalem Company. It's important to me to know, or have some sense of the possiblity, of when and if I can ever contribute to wikipedia again. I enjoy wikipedia alot, I think it is becoming a very credible academic source, and in general helps peole around the globe contribute to a community of those who seek knoweldge, accuracy and in a manner of speaking relish peer review. Would someone please let me know, what steps can be taken or what might occur next toward a transformation of my ban from indefinite to some sort of timeline. I don't kow what else to do here but continue to ask and try to demonstrate my sincerity to those who bother to read this. I know wikipedia can be emailed, or I think it can be, but I would prefer not to do that because I respect the ban and the reason behind it being placed on me--but i think it would be more just and equitable if instead of an indefinite ban on my ability to edit there would be some sort of limited ban. thanks for reading.

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Elchasai! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 866 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Albert Dupuy - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:11, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]